Find the probability for the following z-scores, sketch the normal distribution and associated probability. You may use R to get the probabilities.
Part A: probability Z < -1 (Z is less than -1)
pnorm(-1)
## [1] 0.1586553
Part B: probability Z < 2.35
pnorm(2.35)
## [1] 0.9906133
Part C: probability Z < 0
pnorm(0)
## [1] 0.5
Part D: probability Z > 0
pnorm(0, lower.tail=F)
## [1] 0.5
This can also be found by using the complement of part C.
Part E: probability Z > -0.76
pnorm(-.76, lower.tail=F)
## [1] 0.7763727
# alternatively (symmetric)
pnorm(.76)
## [1] 0.7763727
Part F: probability Z > 2.35
pnorm(2.35, lower.tail=F)
## [1] 0.009386706
Part G: probability -1 < Z < 2.35
pnorm(2.35) - pnorm(-1)
## [1] 0.831958
# alternatively
1 - pnorm(2.35, lower.tail=F) - pnorm(-1)
## [1] 0.831958
Part H: probability -0.76 < Z < 0
pnorm(0) - pnorm(-.76)
## [1] 0.2763727
# can also be found using probabilities above
Verify the 68/95/99.7% rule by sketching a standard Normal distribution, and finding the probability between 1, 2, and 3 standard deviations from the mean.
Values given below
# 68 rule
pnorm(1) - pnorm(-1)
## [1] 0.6826895
# 95 rule
pnorm(2) - pnorm(-2)
## [1] 0.9544997
# 99.7 rule
pnorm(3) - pnorm(-3)
## [1] 0.9973002
The following is a distribution of MCAT scores, an exam frequently used in selection for medical schools. The mean score is 501 and the standard deviation is 11. MCAT scores are not perfectly Normal, but we can use the Normal distribution to get estimates of probabilities/percentages.
Part A: Some schools have an MCAT admission cutoff of 494. What is the chance of picking a person who got a score less than 494?
pnorm(494, mean = 501, sd = 11)
## [1] 0.2622697
Part B: University of Iowa’s College of Medicine’s students have an average MCAT of 515. Roughly what overall percent of people got an MCAT score of 515 or more?
pnorm(515, mean = 501, sd = 11, lower.tail=F)
## [1] 0.1015574
Part C: Roughly what score would someone need to be in the top 25% of test-takers?
There are two ways that come to mind for solving this. You can
use the qnorm function to find the corresponding quantile,
or we can guess and narrow in on picking the appropriate score and
verifying with pnorm. Top 25 percent is equivalent to being above Q3.
The score is roughly 508 or 509
qnorm(.75, mean = 501, sd = 11)
## [1] 508.4194
pnorm(509, mean = 501, sd = 11)
## [1] 0.7664705
Mercury is a chemical that is toxic to humans (and many others animals). From the smokestacks of power plants to the discharges from wastewater treatment plants, and other places, mercury in the form of the compound methylmercury exists in the enviroment, and it can settle to the seafloor and be taken up by tiny organisms that live or feed on bottom sediments.
These compounds aren’t digested, they accumulate within the animals that ingest them, and become more and more concentrated as they pass along the food chain as animals eat and then are eaten in turn. This is biomagnification, and it means that higher-level predators-fish, birds, and marine mammals-build up greater and more dangerous amounts of toxic materials than animals lower on the food chain.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends avoiding eating fish with mercury levels higher than 0.46 \(\mu\)g/g (micro-grams mercury per gram of fish), as they may be harmful.
Suppose the population of yellowfin tuna follows a Normal distribution with an average mercury level of 0.354 \(\mu\)g/g , and a variance of 0.02.
Part A: What is the standard deviation of this population?
# SD = sqrt(var)
sqrt(.02)
## [1] 0.1414214
Part B: Compute the Z-score for a fish with a mercury level of 0.46 \(\mu\)g/g.
(.46 - .354) / .1414214
## [1] 0.749533
Part C: Use the z-score in Part C to answer: What is the probability of catching a yellowfin tuna with an unsafe amount of mercury? Suppose you enjoy eating yellowfin tuna – would you frequently eat yellowfin tuna knowing this information?
pnorm(.75, lower.tail=F)
## [1] 0.2266274
The probability is rather high for my preferences. I would not be willing to, you may have a different answer. Some people may be willing to take the risk if they really like the yellowfin tuna.
Part D: Suppose the standard deviation is acutally .03 instead. Find the probability of catching a yellowfin tuna with an unsafe amount of mercury. Does this change your answer to whether or not you would frequently eat yellowfin tuna?
(.46 - .354) / .03
## [1] 3.533333
pnorm(3.53333, lower.tail=F)
## [1] 0.00020518
The standard deviation is much smaller, which means less variability in mercury amounts for the fish. This results in a much lower probability of getting fish with dangerous amounts of mercury. Some people might be more willing to eat the fish.
Part E: Why do different values for the std. dev. give different probabilities in part C and D? Making a sketch may help your understanding.
Answers may vary. It controls the spread of the Normal distribution, .46 becomes relatively less common on this distribution, even though the mean is the same.